Chelsea Kung vs Emerald Able Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kung vs Able analysis and find out who is favored!
Chelsea Kung vs Emerald Able Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kung 1 - 0 Able
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kung has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Able has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kung, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Able has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kung has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Able has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kung has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Able winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kung has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11). Able has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 14/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kung winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kung winning 2 and Able winning 0. The last match between Kung and Able was at the W15 Shreveport, 27-06-2019, Second, Clay with Chelsea Kung getting the victory 6-0 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kung and Able have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kung winning 0 times and Able 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kung winning 0, and Able 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kung has played against opponents with an average rank of while Able has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kung has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Able has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kung has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Able has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kung 1 - 0 Able
Chelsea Kung
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
Emerald Able
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
38% (9-15)
Career Total W/L
37% (30-51)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Chelsea Kung | Emerald Able |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:14:0 | 1:14:0 |
1st Serve % | 72% (34/47) | 60% (31/52) |
1st Serve Win% | 68% (23/34) | 39% (12/31) |
2nd Serve Win% | 38% (5/13) | 38% (8/21) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 40% (2/5) |
Return Points W% | 62% (32/52) | 40% (19/47) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-4 |
Chelsea Kung
Player
Emerald Able
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Chelsea Kung | Emerald Able |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Chelsea Kung Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Eri Hozumi
Player
Chelsea Kung
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jennifer Elie
Player
Chelsea Kung
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
80%
(
33 of
41)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Chelsea Kung
Player
Emerald Able
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chelsea Kung
Player
Haley Giavara
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
71 of
95)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
2
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
30%
(
9 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
52%
(
45 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
95)
90
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Anastasia Nefedova
Player
Chelsea Kung
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Emerald Able Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Jamilah Snells
Player
Emerald Able
86%
(
65 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Emerald Able
Player
Althea Hudson
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
17 of
36)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
16 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marine Partaud
Player
Emerald Able
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
44%
(
21 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Emma Davis
Player
Emerald Able
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Andrea Renee Villarreal
Player
Emerald Able
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Emerald Able
Player
Kaheaokaleonahenahemaikalani Companion
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
59%
(
13 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Chelsea Kung
Player
Emerald Able
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H |
view more